Death Penalty Worldwide


« Death Penalty Worldwide database and website | Main | A Challenge to the Abolitionist Movement »


U.S. Execution Would Violate International Law

This week, prominent bipartisan groups, including former U.S. diplomats, retired military leaders, former judges and prosecutors, and organizations representing Americans abroad called on the Texas Governor and Board of Pardons and Paroles to grant a stay of execution to Humberto Leal Garcia, a Mexican national on death row in the United States who is scheduled to be executed on July 7. These are not the usual suspects who call for clemency in a death penalty case; in fact, many of them undoubtedly support capital punishment. What unites this diverse group is their concern that if Mr. Leal is executed in violation of a binding judgment of the International Court of Justice, other nations will be emboldened to violate the consular rights of U.S. citizens arrested in foreign countries.

Article 36 of the Vienna Convention on Consular Relations, a treaty ratified by 173 nations, establishes that whenever the authorities arrest a foreign national, they must advise her that she has the right to have her consulate notified of her detention. This applies to foreign nationals arrested in the United States as well as to Americans detained abroad. American foreign exchange students, missionaries and others who have been wrongly detained overseas often say that the assistance of the consulate is more important than the advice of a foreign lawyer. American consulates can help them contact family members, obtain evidence back home, and assist in obtaining competent legal representation.

But when Texas authorities arrested Humberto Leal García, a Mexican national with no prior criminal convictions, they tried, convicted, and sentenced him to death without ever informing him of his consular rights and without notifying the Mexican consulate of his plight. On March 31, 2004, the International Court of Justice held that the United States had breached its obligations under Article 36 of the Vienna Convention in the case of Mr. Leal and 50 other Mexican nationals on death row. The ICJ held that, as a remedy for the violations of Article 36, the United States must provide judicial "review and reconsideration" of Mr. Leal's conviction and sentence to determine whether, and how, he was prejudiced by the violation of his consular rights.

Without the assistance of the Mexican consulate, Humberto Leal received disgracefully inadequate legal representation. One of his trial attorneys has been reprimanded or suspended from the practice of law on multiple occasions as a result of ethical violations. Mr. Leal was convicted on the basis of junk "bite mark" science, since discredited by the National Academy of Sciences, and patently unreliable forensic evidence. Although the prosecution's case was reed thin, his defense failed to effectively challenge any of this evidence. During his sentencing hearing, which lasted only a single day, Mr. Leal's attorneys failed to present any of the profoundly mitigating evidence that later came to light with the assistance of the Mexican government. The jury that sentenced Mr. Leal to death never learned that he was the victim of horrific sexual abuse by his parish priest, which had severe and lasting effects. Jurors never realized that Mr. Leal had struggled to overcome learning disabilities and frontal lobe brain damage and spent his childhood dodging neighborhood gangs and beatings from his parents. Based on the distorted, incomplete picture of Mr. Leal provided by the prosecution, he never stood a chance.

Former President Bush directed the Texas courts to review Mr. Leal's conviction and sentence in accordance with the ICJ's decision, but Texas refused. The United States Supreme Court has found that while the U.S. has an international legal obligation to comply with the ICJ's decision, only Congress can implement the decision by passing legislation. Congress is now poised to do just that – but Texas has announced that it nonetheless intends to go forward with Mr. Leal's execution. A stay of execution is essential to prevent an irreparable breach of the United States' treaty commitments, and to protect the rights of all Americans who rely on the protections of the Vienna Convention. And unless Mr. Leal receives a reprieve, he will die before he ever sees justice.

For more information about Mr. Leal's case and the efforts to save his life, visit

-- Sandra Babcock


Feed You can follow this conversation by subscribing to the comment feed for this post.

I was very impressed and felt had to get a valuable experience after reading your article.

When visiting London for a short trip or business meeting, and you need a companion to be with you when
you need her please visit our website to look for London escorts.
We can help you get the right company and find the local attractions and hotels.

Good article. nice words

Great Post!!!!

Cincinnati DUI Lawyer

Any news if the Mexican national is executed or not? Execution is not advisable since we don't have the power and authority to take lives whatever the offense he had made. A reclusion perpetua or permanent imprisonment is enough to make him pay for what he have done. - Mike of

I wish they would bring it back to the UK. Prison is no longer a deterrent.

Death penalty should be banned. No one born bad, Its all environment and surrounding makes them bad..good in our country no death sentence,

Nice article of Mr. Leal's execution.

I would like to say that this blog really convinced me, you give me best information! Thanks, very good post.

Such a nice article. Justice for all!

I am an American and I am appalled that the U.S. does not hold itself to the same standards that we hold other countries.

is incredible that the U.S. does not comply with international law and nothing happens

Good post I learn from your death penalty posts.

Your website is very informative and thorough. I read the blogs each time they are sent. Thanks for your contributions and taking the time to share.

I think so that this execution can violate the main law.

I beg to disagree,death penalty should not be implemented because no one has the right to take someone's life without God's consent.

Looks like Texas is a very powerful State and disobey decisions by Congress or directions by former president Bush! I will try to find if Mr Leal was executed or not.

it is the heart afraid of breaking ,I think

Nice article of Mr. Leal's execution.

Execution is not really the best, i prefer life sentence.

Well they did put him to death so it goes to show that the US weren't too worried about the reaction from other countries.

Thanks for sharing this informative piece of legal news.

Excellent blog! I really love how it is easy on my eyes and the facts are well written. I have subscribed myself for latest blog posts.

Based on the distorted, incomplete picture of Mr. Leal provided by the prosecution, he never stood a chance.

I would like to say that this blog really convinced me, you give me best information! Thanks, very good post.

The comments to this entry are closed.